Skip to main content

Storing Private Stuff in Public Space

Occasionally I joke on Twitter about my  plan to buy an old, beat-up Chevy Astro Van, park it on the street near my house, and use it exclusively as storage space. It sounds ridiculous, but it's actually an interesting thought experiment.

(from analog photo fun on Flickr)

People typically react by saying that doing this would be an abuse of the public parking system. Street parking is supposed to be for parking cars, not storing stuff they say. But in essence, street parking (public space) is used to store automobiles (privately owned things) for little to no cost (it would cost me $35 per year for a residential permit in my neighborhood). Using a van for storage would cost significantly less money than renting a space at one of those self storage warehouses, and it would be a lot more convenient.

Using an Astro Van as a storage locker would cause some pain for drivers in my neighborhood. Since I'd never move the van (except when legally necessary for street sweeping or an emergency no-parking permit holder) the space would never turn over. I'd single-handedly eliminate a valuable parking space from the neighborhood. And yet - doing so is perfectly legal and within my rights, under the current law.

Why is it that if I want to store a bunch of junk, I should have to go pay market price to do so? But if I want to store a car, the city will give me space, near my home, for practically free? That's really the central issue that's going to be at the heart of the many parking debates to come this summer. There will be finger pointing, there will be claims about what street parking should be for, and who street parking should be for and why it should be provided for next to no cost.

At the end of the day there will be a lot of unhappy people. But as I see it, this is an issue that will always have a lot of unhappy people. We're talking about a lucrative government subsidy, after all; and the people who like getting it aren't going to give it up without a fight.


Anonymous said…
I'm pretty sure that someone near Sherman Circle in Petworth has already had this idea...there's an old ex-Uhaul truck that hasn't moved from the area in months.
ES said…
You don't even need an RPP or to move the car periodically on some blocks. Kitty-corner to me in Petworth is a block near Sherman Circle that is bordered on both sides by NPS land, and it has neither street sweeping nor RPP requirements. There are always two or three large panel trucks, vans, or storage trailers (often with Maryland tags) parked there. One truck has never once moved.
DC20009 said…
I used to have a car which I drove very infrequently, so I was doing essentially what you propose, except that my car was empty. It was very blatantly empty - glove compartemnt empty and open, back seats folded down to clearly show the full hatchback area to be empty - all in an effort to keep my windows unbroken and my car unburgled. In that spirit, if you pursue yourr idea, I suggest you find a model that doesn't have as many windows as shown in the photo, because if you store a lot of stuff and it's so visible (even if boxed) your stuff will be gone in weeks.
IMGoph said…
I can one-up you here. When I lived in Bloomingdale, there was a box truck that was permanently parked on 1st Street, and it wasn't storage - it was housing. A guy lived in the back of the truck, got up early in the morning and took off for the day. Saw him regularly leave the truck in the middle of the night to relieve himself on the sidewalk.
Anonymous said…
The downtown developers already do it. They rent containers, deposit them on the street, and then park their cars in them. The containers probably arrive with materials in them, but as the materials go in the building, they turn into convenient reserved parking.
Anonymous said…
wouldn't you also have to pay the registration fee and auto insurance in order to park it legally on the street? I'm not sure it would be that economical with those fees added in but I like your thinking.
Anonymous said…
Even with registration and insurance, I doubt it would be more expensive than renting a storage unit. At the Extra Space storage on U St., the smallest unit (only 3x4, smaller than the interior of a van by far) is $70/month. RPP = $35/year, registration = $72/year, inspection = $17.50/year (2 years @ $35), and if you're not driving it, you'd likely only get bare-bones liability-only insurance, which is $500/year or less if you have good credit and a clean driving record. That's $624.50/year versus $840. BUT, the Astro Van has 170 cubic feet of cargo room to the smallest unit's only 120. To get the same capacity, you'd need to upgrade to a larger unit. The cheapest unit that meets or exceeds the capacity of the van is $91/month or $1092/year. If you needed this space for, say, 3 years, you'd save over $1400. And here's an Astro Van for sale for $1350: (or $800 even!

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Mixing Sports and Business

In the last two days I've devoured every article in the Washington Post about the Nationals painful and epic defeat on Friday night in the NLDS. It was a tough way to see the season end, there's no doubt about that.

(from wallyg on Flickr)
These articles make it clear that there are a lot of people emotionally invested in professional sports. I think they sometimes they forget that, ultimately, Major League Baseball is big business. Each team is a major corporation and the league itself is an organization governed by a bunch of executives. The television networks that show the games are under contract with the team owners and the games aren't usually available to those without cable.

This is why it can be so hard to be a fan in this game. It's the multi-millionaire and billionaire owners that call most of the shots. They get to decide how much they're willing to spend on players. They get to decide who to hire as the CEO of the company. They get to decide how much t…