Skip to main content

Freedom to...

Last week Yglesias commented on the ideological similarities between urbanists and Tea-Partiers, but concludes that the Tea Party isn't likely to take an interest in urban issues since most of them don't live in, or have any personal stake in cities, whereas, many of their political opponents do.

(from katerkate on Flickr)

I think another issue is that when talking about policies that best constitute liberty or freedom, it can be difficult for people to figure out when the government is actually taking less of a role, versus when they're taking on more power.

For instance, I could say that government ought to end sprawl subsidies. It should stop funding roads and public utilities. It shouldn't have bailed out auto manufacturers and shouldn't continue to make policy that is primarily auto-centric. Of course, the flip side of this argument is that doing so would mean that the government wants to make us live like in dense cities like Europeans. Is it true? No. But it's a compelling argument to someone who wants to believe it.

Similarly, I could say that it's the result of big government intervention that developers and businesses are forced to over-supply parking spaces in American cities. But a tea-partier could turn around and say changing the law just infringes on their right to park for free. I could say that we ought to toll highways, and someone on the other side of the fence would say that it's government trying to pick the pockets of ordinary citizens.

I recently mentioned that sometimes it all comes down to what's the default. Right now, sprawl in the norm, so any policy designed to reverse sprawl actually looks interventionist, even if it's designed to let the market, not the government, influence outcomes.


Eric said…
“But a tea-partier could turn around and say changing the law just infringes on their right to park for free.”
Somebody could see it that way, but I suspect few do. Perceptions aside, I would assume that most discussions of liberty in America really involve the question of the degree to which we permit and want government activity. Government activity can come in the form of spending programs or in regulations.
Government spending programs, be they bailouts to GM--- or the UAW, really--- or be they highway subsidies, are paid for through taxes that come from a variety of sources. These programs forcefully confiscate wealth from people through taxes and redistribute the wealth to other favored lobbies and interests through spending.
Whenever the government makes a decision to force someone to build X amount of parking or even when it distributes subsidies to some group, it made a decision about how somebody else’s wealth will be spent.
I would like to eliminate corn subsidies, but I am forced to pay for them through taxes because corn-producing states have a lot of Senators collectively. I’d hardly call it a grave injustice, but the fact I had no choice in subsidizing corn is technically an infringement on individual choice.
Lowering government spending lowers taxes and allows people more choice in how their wealth will be spent. Sure, one less highway means fewer driving choices (less freedom), but the driving choice was really a luxury forcefully subsidized by somebody else. The main difference here is that the taxation that supported the highway was forceful, where as the lack of a highway was never an act of force.

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Mixing Sports and Business

In the last two days I've devoured every article in the Washington Post about the Nationals painful and epic defeat on Friday night in the NLDS. It was a tough way to see the season end, there's no doubt about that.

(from wallyg on Flickr)
These articles make it clear that there are a lot of people emotionally invested in professional sports. I think they sometimes they forget that, ultimately, Major League Baseball is big business. Each team is a major corporation and the league itself is an organization governed by a bunch of executives. The television networks that show the games are under contract with the team owners and the games aren't usually available to those without cable.

This is why it can be so hard to be a fan in this game. It's the multi-millionaire and billionaire owners that call most of the shots. They get to decide how much they're willing to spend on players. They get to decide who to hire as the CEO of the company. They get to decide how much t…