Skip to main content

Inconvenient Bus Travel

I have a lot of mixed feelings when it comes to inter-city bus travel. I understand the benefits of riding these buses to get from one city to another. I certainly appreciate the low cost. I've also had bad enough experiences to make me question whether I ever want to give them my business again.

Lydia DePillis writes that Megabus and Boltbus are both moving their operations from a great location in downtown DC near Metro Center, to much less desirable locations, in lieu of construction that's about to begin on CityCenterDC.

(from kenudigit on Flickr)

This is a really unfortunate turn of events. While Boltbus's new location won't be too terrible, Megabus's new pick-up and drop-off point at North Capital and K Street will be significantly worse. One of the great things about these bus operators, at least compared to Greyhound, is that you don't have to get to an awful bus station in a bad part of town. Or at least you didn't used to have to... And their marketing pitch is that they'll pick you up in a convenient location, right on the street, and by saving money on overhead, can pass that cost onto the customers.

As these bus companies grow, it becomes harder to maintain on-the-street pickups, so the pressure to consolidate into centralized bus stations grows, or regulatory pressure will push them into less-than-desirable locations.

This reminds me of the age-old bus vs. rail debate, not just for long-distance travel, but for any kind of travel. Bus are almost always a less-expensive alternative to rail. Sometimes, flexibility is cited as an advantage, but it's not always advantageous. Train stations will never move; bus stops can disappear or move overnight, routes can be altered or canceled easily.

I can pretty confidently say that in 5 or 10 years there will be trains making trips between DC and New York. As for these low-cost buses? I certainly can't make the same claim with any level of certainty.

Comments

Matt' said…
Excellent points.

Honestly, I don't know how they can survive based on their pricing structure. They *have* to be losing money.

Which is fine, from the standpoint of building a new market. But I don't see how they'll make it in the long run.

I hope Megabus makes it at least until June, though, because I have a trip planned, and Megabus is the only feasible option.
Anonymous said…
Matt
I wouldn't worry as Megabus is owned by one of the world's largest and shrewdest transport companies Stagecoach. http://www.stagecoachgroup.com/
Here is Britain they run a huge amount of trains, buses and of course Megabus and although offering a few cheap fares they make mega amounts of money.
Anonymous said…
Matt
I wouldn't worry as Megabus is owned by one of the world's largest and shrewdest transport companies Stagecoach. http://www.stagecoachgroup.com/
Here is Britain they run a huge amount of trains, buses and of course Megabus and although offering a few cheap fares they make mega amounts of money.
Rob Pitingolo said…
I wouldn't be so worried about Megabus going out of business, but I would be cautious about Megabus canceling routes that aren't working out for them.
Jack Po said…
I am not at all convinced that these busses will disappear. I am a fairly price insensitive traveler between DC and New York, and

1) cannot deal with airplanes and their absurd security / procedures / delays
2) even the Acela isn't much faster than the bus and has random delays that are so unpredictable that I can't rely on them anymore

So basically I'm left with these busses that even with its sketchy qualities give me

1) fairly reliable arrival times
2) power & Internet access (though I use data cards usually)

I don't really see flight and rail travel fixing their structural problems in the next decade (or even two decades) though.

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Good Advertising

The blogosphere seems to be one fire over Microsoft's new "Lauren" TV commercial. Frankly, I don't see what the commotion is about.



If the critics are correct, then "Lauren" is actually Lauren De Long, a Screen Actors Guild eligible actress; and apparently, if you look close enough, she never even enters the Apple store.

Even if all of that is true, it doesn't refute the fact that Apple's laptops are significantly more expensive than most PCs. It isn't a lie that Apple doesn't sell any 17-inch laptops for less than a grand. The advertisement doesn't make any reference to the quality of the machines (or contest any of the claims made in Apple's "I'm a PC" commercials) or provide any good reason to buy one other than price.

As far as I can tell, after years of horrible commercials and a series of flops, Microsoft seems to finally have hired an ad agency that put together a decent advertisement. It's not likely to persuad…