Skip to main content

Progressive Parking Pricing

Tom Vanderbilt has a really interesting column in Slate about the history behind parking meters, the challenges of current parking policy, and how these might be dealt with in the future.

(from itspaulkelly on Flickr)

Last week I was thinking about how the pricing for Capital Bikeshare (and similar bikeshare systems) might be applied to parking meters. Currently, most parking meters charge a fix rate for a fixed amount of time. For example, 2 dollars per hour. If you want to park for up to a half-hour, you pay 1 dollar. If you want to park for four hours, you pay 8 dollars.

Capital Bikeshare, on the other hand, uses a progressive pricing system. So the longer you keep the bike, the more you have to pay.

The pricing structure breaks down like this:
0-30 min: $0.00
31-60 min: $1.50
61-90 min: $4.50
91-120 min: $10.50
2 - 2.5 hours: $16.50
2.5 - 3 hours: $22.50
3 - 3.5 hours: $28.50
3.5 - 4 hours: $34.50
4 - 4.5 hours: $40.50
4.5 - 5 hours: $46.50
5 - 5.5 hours: $52.50
5.5 - 6 hours: $58.50
6 - 6.5 hours: $64.50
6.5 - 24 hours: $70.50
Theoretically, this makes perfect sense. The goal of bike sharing is to maintain high turnover of the bikes. Charging low prices for short trips and very high prices for long trips accomplishes this. It provides incentive against grabbing a bike and keeping it out all day when they're not using it.

Why not apply this pricing scheme to parking?

Consider a neighborhood that has both on-street and garage parking - Georgetown in DC, for example. In most cases, on-street parking is disproportionately less expensive than garage parking, so it's no surprise that all the street spaces fill up before all the garage spaces. This can be a problem for those who show up at the wrong time and can't find a street space.

If parking were priced at a progressive rate, then short-term parking would be relatively less expensive on the street, but long-term parking would be relatively less expensive in the garage. People looking for short-term parking would have an easier time finding a space and that space would still be affordable to them. In this scenario, the losers are those who want to park for a low-price for a long period of time.

So, is this better than a market-based system of pricing? Yes and no. The market-based system is theoretically more efficient, but it also requires more advanced technology and it makes the price of parking less predictable. The progressive system is more predictable, but payments will have to be credit/debit card or digital payment only.

Perhaps the best thing it has going for it is that it's not entirely unfriendly in the political realm. Being able to say that short-term parking is "free" should appease some of the people who would otherwise oppose paying.

Comments

Dan M. said…
This is truly an extraordinary observation. I never made the connections that you make in this article.

It does make sense to price for high turnover. However, as you said, the enforcement would be challenging. Also, this should only be offered where a long-term garage option (which would be heavily advertised) is located nearby.

Overall, a good concept that should be discussed in the political arena. But alas.... maybe one day.

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Good Advertising

The blogosphere seems to be one fire over Microsoft's new "Lauren" TV commercial. Frankly, I don't see what the commotion is about.



If the critics are correct, then "Lauren" is actually Lauren De Long, a Screen Actors Guild eligible actress; and apparently, if you look close enough, she never even enters the Apple store.

Even if all of that is true, it doesn't refute the fact that Apple's laptops are significantly more expensive than most PCs. It isn't a lie that Apple doesn't sell any 17-inch laptops for less than a grand. The advertisement doesn't make any reference to the quality of the machines (or contest any of the claims made in Apple's "I'm a PC" commercials) or provide any good reason to buy one other than price.

As far as I can tell, after years of horrible commercials and a series of flops, Microsoft seems to finally have hired an ad agency that put together a decent advertisement. It's not likely to persuad…