Skip to main content

Height Restrictions

The New York Times recently had a pretty good article about the height limit debate in DC. It's worth a read.

(from Mdrewe on Flickr)

In general, I think the height restriction is a pretty terrible policy. Unlike some who share this sentiment, I'm not convinced that overturning it will suddenly fix all of the problems it's created. Similarly, the idea that reversal of the height limit will radically change DC's skyline overnight seems overblown as well.

Could a few extra stories be added to the top of downtown buildings? Probably... Would skyscrapers pop up where modest buildings currently exist? Not in the short-term. That sort of transformation would take years or decades to happen.

Ultimately though, I have a difficult time taking the preservationist arguments seriously. If you stand down on the waterfront in Georgetown and look across the river, you see what looks like a downtown. Of course, that's Rosslyn, and the reason it is allowed to exist is because a state border just happens to fall in-between.

Reversing the height limit now could make DC look like few other American cities. Instead of a few skyscrapers downtown, you'd probably see dense development occur around Metro stations, not unlike what's happened along the orange line in Arlington. It's hard to roll-back development that's already occurred; and that development has happened under a pretty strict height limit.


Peter Smith said…
The arguments of tall buildings proponents cannot be taken seriously.

Taller buildings need:
- Heavier foundations.
- Extra wind bracing.
- More space for elevators.
- More and larger mechanical systems for ventilation and heating.

In other words, taller buildings are less efficient than shorter/regular buildings. Tall buildings are not 'smart growth' -- they are dumb growth, as they are inherently unsustainable.

And that says nothing of their ill consequences for the people who live in/on/under/around them.

And I love the huge tax revenue numbers the developers have been trotting out. One would think every city with massive amounts of skyscrapers was rich, but if we look around at all of those 'rich' cities, it seems they too are at least as poor as DC. So, will DC become budget-rich if we start buildings skyscrapers, or is that just a fantastic fantasy?
Rob Pitingolo said…
Peter, I'm not arguing for which type of building is more or less energy efficient. By your interpretation, almost most buildings are inherently unsustainable.
ZZinDC said…
Were the height restriciton lifted, I would expect a lot of redevelopment in downtown DC. In the last few years I have seen many smaller older office buildings in the K Street corridor torn down and replaced with new more dense buldings - not taller but filling every square inch of available space with building. I don't think this would be a widespread occurance, but I would expect to see it the premium locations - K St, Connecticut Ave, maybe the old downtown F St, maybe NoMa, which would provide great views of the Capitol. Would it ruin the city? Probably not, but I also don't think it would make it rich either. I just don't think there's any compelling reason to rush into a change.

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Mixing Sports and Business

In the last two days I've devoured every article in the Washington Post about the Nationals painful and epic defeat on Friday night in the NLDS. It was a tough way to see the season end, there's no doubt about that.

(from wallyg on Flickr)
These articles make it clear that there are a lot of people emotionally invested in professional sports. I think they sometimes they forget that, ultimately, Major League Baseball is big business. Each team is a major corporation and the league itself is an organization governed by a bunch of executives. The television networks that show the games are under contract with the team owners and the games aren't usually available to those without cable.

This is why it can be so hard to be a fan in this game. It's the multi-millionaire and billionaire owners that call most of the shots. They get to decide how much they're willing to spend on players. They get to decide who to hire as the CEO of the company. They get to decide how much t…