Skip to main content

Sprawl Killed My Hometown

Angie Schmitt has a very good post up at Streetsblog about the devastation that suburban sprawl has brought on the city of Cleveland.

(from Flickr user gwdexter)

When I lived in Cleveland, I often felt like sprawl wasn't an issue that was discussed openly and objectively enough. Bring it up, and the conversation would often regress to a simple defense of suburbs. To me, one problem was that few people were willing to stick up for the city. It was generally accepted that well-to-do people lived in suburbs because suburbs were objectively better. People preferred them over the city. It was just a better place to be. Not to mention that a good chunk of the few people still in the city wanted to move to the suburbs too.

Here's the thing... every American city has suburbs and every American city has sprawl. New York City has sprawl. Washington DC has sprawl. San Fransisco has sprawl. What Cleveland has is donut sprawl - nice suburbs surrounding a hallowed-out city. Cleveland has suburbs just as quiet and safe as I've seen in any other metro area. That's not the point. The existence of such a weak central city is hugely problematic. It ultimately hurts the entire metro area.

As Angie writes, maybe the federal government can guide Cleveland in the right direction, but the future still looks blurry.

Comments

bulldog_nation said…
Overall I think you are right about the situation Cleveland is encountering. I do not think the federal government should become too involved, as that would be a step toward socialism. Cleveland really needs to attract some sort of business ventures to create more jobs. The local and state governments should definitely put more effort into reviving Cleveland. Tourism can also help boost their economy. With an improved economy, the sprawl of a failing city won’t affect the upper level suburbs they have to offer. Left unattended, Cleveland could become the next Detroit.

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Good Advertising

The blogosphere seems to be one fire over Microsoft's new "Lauren" TV commercial. Frankly, I don't see what the commotion is about.



If the critics are correct, then "Lauren" is actually Lauren De Long, a Screen Actors Guild eligible actress; and apparently, if you look close enough, she never even enters the Apple store.

Even if all of that is true, it doesn't refute the fact that Apple's laptops are significantly more expensive than most PCs. It isn't a lie that Apple doesn't sell any 17-inch laptops for less than a grand. The advertisement doesn't make any reference to the quality of the machines (or contest any of the claims made in Apple's "I'm a PC" commercials) or provide any good reason to buy one other than price.

As far as I can tell, after years of horrible commercials and a series of flops, Microsoft seems to finally have hired an ad agency that put together a decent advertisement. It's not likely to persuad…