Skip to main content

The Business of Baseball

Phil Birnbaum recently had a pretty interesting article in Slate about the business behind Major League Baseball. He contends that the Pittsburgh Pirates, despite being notoriously awful, is actually a pretty profitable business organization; and as the result of MLB's goofy revenue sharing scheme, there's good reason to believe spending more money to win more games would actually reduce profits.

(from Flickr user daveynin)

We can't know exactly how MLB team spending will effect profitability, but let's temporarily assume the Pirates are being a profit-maximizing enterprise by being terrible. Does that mean the team's owners are content with being losers?

Maybe, but maybe not. While owning a professional sports team is, in many instances, a great way to make money; most professional sports owners are already successful and wealthy business people well before the time they purchase a team. There are plenty of sports owners with gigantic egos. Profits have value, bragging rights have value too.

Admittedly, I'm ignorant about the Pittsburgh Pirates and its ownership. But the point applies to more than a single team - even if Birnbaum's back-of-the-envelop calculations are correct, winning games has value to sports owners, even if it means less money in the bank at the end of the season.

Comments

B. P. Beckley said…
Well, there's a difference between making less money and not making money at all, and there's a difference between being not terrible and winning the World Series (or even making the playoffs). The problem with baseball teams in the small markets is they can't pay high enough salaries to reliably compete with the Yankees and Red Soxes of the world, so the question turns from "How much are willing to pay to win?" to "How much are you willing to pay to be respectable, seeing as winning is impossible?", and that's where the bottom line maximizing instincts of a successful businessman are going to kick in.

I wasn't aware that MLB had any revenue sharing at all, but that's certainly what the revenue sharing is designed to address.

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Good Advertising

The blogosphere seems to be one fire over Microsoft's new "Lauren" TV commercial. Frankly, I don't see what the commotion is about.



If the critics are correct, then "Lauren" is actually Lauren De Long, a Screen Actors Guild eligible actress; and apparently, if you look close enough, she never even enters the Apple store.

Even if all of that is true, it doesn't refute the fact that Apple's laptops are significantly more expensive than most PCs. It isn't a lie that Apple doesn't sell any 17-inch laptops for less than a grand. The advertisement doesn't make any reference to the quality of the machines (or contest any of the claims made in Apple's "I'm a PC" commercials) or provide any good reason to buy one other than price.

As far as I can tell, after years of horrible commercials and a series of flops, Microsoft seems to finally have hired an ad agency that put together a decent advertisement. It's not likely to persuad…