Skip to main content

Smart Parking Meters

When urbanists think about parking meters, we typically think that they are necessary to correctly set the market price for parking in a particular urban area. Many of us also think that people who gripe about them simply don't want to pay, and that they don't understand why metered parking makes spaces more accessible when they might otherwise not be. Admittedly, I used to think this way.

(from Flickr user CascadeFoto)

My thinking changed last weekend, when I was out for lunch with a friend of the blog. This person was perfectly willing to pay for a metered parking space, but was aggravated by the meters anyway. Why? Because the meter had a maximum time of 1-hour. After an hour, one of us would have to run out and put more quarters in the meter, a highly inconvenient proposition, even though we were completely willing to pay.

I'd go a step further and say that for people who think they can beat the system and avoid getting a ticket, or who believe 'free parking' is a god-given right deserve any parking ticket that they get. But there is another subset of people, those who simply forget the time at which their meter expires, or intend to run out but lose track of time, or have a pocket full of pennies but no quarters, then get an expensive ticket and then curse the whole phenomenon of metered parking. It's this second group of people that we should think about.

This is an instance in which technology really could be the answer. Meters could be installed with a technology linked to mobile phones so that all payments could be made online automatically. Maybe a person could tell the meter how much time to give them and then pay a pro-rated rate based on the time they use. They could have the option to automatically add more time once the meter expires. Maybe they could set it for an indefinite period of time and pay for all the time they used whenever they return. For the people who don't believe in technology, the meters could still accept quarters and dimes.

It may seem over-the-top now, but in a year or two it might not. After all, it was only a year or two that smartphones even started plaing a significant role in people's lives. Now there are smartphone apps that do things so incredible even I am routinely amazed.

Comments

C said…
Here in Bethesda, Maryland, at least one of the garages (I don't own a car, nor do I drive regularly) has mobile payment as an option. I believe the system is called Go Park Now.

http://www.goparknow.com/
Jeff said…
I agree with upgrading meters - that's long overdue in most cities in the US. And I think the 1-hour meter your friend was dealing with is probably a little restrictive, but the system you're proposing seems to undermine the service that metered on-street parking is meant to provide. The purpose is supposed to be for people going to lunch at a restaurant, or running a few errands in one area and then heading out. It's not meant to accommodate all-day parking. Clearly you could turn it into an all-day parking spot in the way you mentioned - by physically visiting and feeding the machine. But the system you're proposing makes it too easy for an office worker to park on the curb and remotely add time.

I don't think the technology you're proposing seems very far off, I just don't think it should be used in that scenario.
Rob Pitingolo said…
C, thanks for the tip.

Jeff, I tend to agree with you. But I wonder how much this could be addressed by charging for parking progressively based on how close a space is to the front door? Under the current system, we have a lot full of meters that charge the same rate, but vary based on how often you have to re-feed the meter. Perhaps we could have a lot full of theoretically 'unlimited time' meters that vary in cost based on location? That would make it economically disadvantageous for that office worker to do what you fear would happen.

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Good Advertising

The blogosphere seems to be one fire over Microsoft's new "Lauren" TV commercial. Frankly, I don't see what the commotion is about.



If the critics are correct, then "Lauren" is actually Lauren De Long, a Screen Actors Guild eligible actress; and apparently, if you look close enough, she never even enters the Apple store.

Even if all of that is true, it doesn't refute the fact that Apple's laptops are significantly more expensive than most PCs. It isn't a lie that Apple doesn't sell any 17-inch laptops for less than a grand. The advertisement doesn't make any reference to the quality of the machines (or contest any of the claims made in Apple's "I'm a PC" commercials) or provide any good reason to buy one other than price.

As far as I can tell, after years of horrible commercials and a series of flops, Microsoft seems to finally have hired an ad agency that put together a decent advertisement. It's not likely to persuad…