Skip to main content

Not My Lifestyle Kind of Center

Earlier this week I took my bike and rode over to Legacy Village, one of two "lifestyle centers" in suburban Cleveland. I've been to Legacy Village before. I don't visit often. Every previous visit I made, I came and went like 99% of the visitors: by driving in a car and parking in the ginormous "free" surface parking lot. Only after I made a trip in a way the designers didn't intend it to be made did I get a perspective on why these "lifestyle centers" are truly so awful.

(from Flickr user parislemon)

Legacy Village is the kind of place Jim Kunstler would probably call a "cartoon architecture". It's a fantasy of an idealized "village". Nobody actually lives there. There really aren't many local businesses. When you think about it, everything is kind of foreign. The people live elsewhere. The businesses live elsewhere. Every night the little village shuts and reopens again the next morning.

There are two primary entrances to the center. One on Cedar Road and one on Richmond Road. There is a perimeter road with 25 mph speed limit signs, but the streets were designed to handle traffic moving at speeds well exceeding 25. Many drivers ignore the speed limit, and why shouldn't they? The designers built the perimeter road so that they would feel safe flying around every curve.

During my visit the heated sidewalks inside the center were salted, dried and cleared so that no "pedestrian" would have any trouble moving from store to store. But the sidewalk right outside the center on Cedar Road, the street that I carried my bike along to get to the center, was covered in a foot of week-old snow. No salt. No plow. Nothing. The street itself was clear and dry. Cars sped by at 40mph.

Legacy Village is surrounded by an ocean of free parking spaces, but bike parking spaces are few and far between. I couldn't find a rack near my destination on the main "courtyard", although I was told after the fact that there is a rack somewhere near the Apple store. I locked my bike to a fence and on top of about a half-foot of snow.

In the end, the question in my mind was, what kind of "lifestyle" does the center attract? It's ironic that in order to be a pedestrian inside its boarders, it's essentially a prerequisite that you must be a motorist to get there. It's convincing evidence that if what we want is density and walkability, the solution doesn't come prepackaged in some faux village on the outskirts of a city. We had real towns, villages and cities in this country for most of its history. And we destroyed them and replaced it with this? That's sad. Really sad.

Comments

Michael said…
This sounds like it's actually just a shopping mall without a roof.
W. K. Lis said…
Wonder if the "second" and "third" floor "windows" open up onto offices or apartments? Probably not.
Cavan said…
Making real places is too hard so why not just fake it? Just sad. I wish they could have some good TOD on Cleveland's one heavy rail line. But, that would require actual planning and political will.

The suburban mall is a dying breed. The "lifestyle center" is a sad attempt to prop up a business model that is a relic of the 20th century. Check out what I wrote about it a year ago: http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post.cgi?id=1550
Actually it sounds more like an amusement park. If they had cartoon characters walking around maybe you would feel the full effect.
Anonymous said…
Exactly! Out of the mouth of babes. Many people have been fighting this type of development for a long time. Me, I've spent 20 years at it. It's good to know that there are others who see what I see. Its' good to know that there are reinforcements!
larchlion said…
As always, retailers are the slowest to move. These 'malls without a roof' are one step in the direction back towards normalcy. Prototypical development is incremental and retail developers, retail tenants, and to some extent the shoppers move at a snail's pace.

When cars arrived and provided the freedom (real or debt-fueled/imaginary) to move middle class out of cities to suburbs, retail eventually followed. Its initial format was as infantile and poorly designed as possible. The typical strip retail.

Then people eventually realized, "hey, this experience sucks. Let's capture the walkable nature of old city shopping districts, but put them out in the burbs, in drive to locations." Malls. They captured the synergy of clustering more retailers together.

Eventually, we realized the quality of this experience was overblown, so we opened them up to malls w/o roofs. Then, more recently we created "main street districts" which are malls without roofs, but with cars. All are still drive-to. Some have recently begun to even become mixed-use.

The ones that survive moving forward will be those that are able to adopt and adapt to the principles of urban/suburban cores and introduce more mixed-use, residential, blend in with the context, improve connectivity for modal transpo outside of the car, etc etc.

I'm not defending them, but suggesting, they are all steps slowly getting back to baseline design/city evolution. The 20th century will be forgotten within 50 years. Hopefully not the lessons, but certainly the forms and patterns.
Rob Pitingolo said…
@Michael, that pretty much sums it up the functionality of the place.

@W.K. Lis, there are offices for the management company, but no apartments. A lot of the exterior design is fake. It looks like it should be apartments or condos. In a real village, it would be.

@Cavan, absolutely, the failure to do much of any TOD around the heavy rail line is truly a shame. Is it thus a surprise that it has the lowest ridership per mile for heavy rail in America?

@rebekah's valentine, I understand that in the summer there are little 'festival' type events on the courtyard. Perhaps some of them have costumed characters.

@Anonymous, yes, you have company.

@larchlion, thanks for putting this into perspective.
Nate Lord said…
Building brand new places on relatively cheap rural land is the most profitable for developers. In the so-called golden triangle in Ky formed by Louisville, Lexington, and northern Ky (Cincinnati suburbs) there lies pristine Trimble County. When it is developed I suggest that it be subdivided into lots with houses but not built with roads. Instead auto manufacturers can build civilian versions of the Stryker. Covenants running with the land will allow vehicle users to drive anywhere in the county--roads or no. Well-armed householders can shoot at all-terrain vehicles which plow through rose gardens &c. Given the culture prevailing in this part of the country, I think many people would love living in such a place.

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Good Advertising

The blogosphere seems to be one fire over Microsoft's new "Lauren" TV commercial. Frankly, I don't see what the commotion is about.



If the critics are correct, then "Lauren" is actually Lauren De Long, a Screen Actors Guild eligible actress; and apparently, if you look close enough, she never even enters the Apple store.

Even if all of that is true, it doesn't refute the fact that Apple's laptops are significantly more expensive than most PCs. It isn't a lie that Apple doesn't sell any 17-inch laptops for less than a grand. The advertisement doesn't make any reference to the quality of the machines (or contest any of the claims made in Apple's "I'm a PC" commercials) or provide any good reason to buy one other than price.

As far as I can tell, after years of horrible commercials and a series of flops, Microsoft seems to finally have hired an ad agency that put together a decent advertisement. It's not likely to persuad…