Skip to main content

NCAA Game Theory

Last year I downloaded a huge set of data to build a model that would estimate the bracket with the highest probability of winning a March Madness pool. I did OK in the three pools I entered, winning one of them. But I've had some time to rethink the strategy, and incorporate another cross-section of data. Now that the betting is closed for this year's tournament, I'll share a few of my thoughts.

(from Flickr user SD Dirk)

First, picking March Madness winners is at least as much about game theory as it is about raw mathematics. The problem with the bracket that my model tells me has the highest probability of winning is that it picks the same winner that most of the other participants are picking. This year, that's Kansas. When you have the 'favorite' team as the winner in your bracket, that means you need to stay ahead by picking a lot of early games correctly - that's tough because those games have the least predictable outcomes. The better strategy is to start with the team that has the most plausible chance of winning, but which the fewest others have picked. For me, this year, that's Syracuse.

Second, picking upsets early is a sucker's game, even in pools that give bonus points for correct upset picks. Undoubtedly the first weekend of the tournament is the most exciting, because everyone still has a fighting chance in their pools. At the end of the first weekend, scores are tabulated and people go into work on Monday morning either happy or upset with their placement. But it really doesn't matter, because picking upsets early doesn't guarantee you'll pick the right Final Four or the right champion. If you go overboard with the upsets, you'll probably "upset out" the teams that have the best change of winning the thing!

Third, it's probably true that it's better not to know anything about college basketball before Selection Sunday. That doesn't mean you should be completely ignorant - it means you should base picks on the statistics, not some narrative you've built up in your head. There is a lot of risk for psychological bias in bracket picking. It's extremely tempting to fall into this trap.

Best of luck to everyone this year.

Comments

Nate said…
my bracket is terrible and entirely based upon narrative reasons in my head

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Good Advertising

The blogosphere seems to be one fire over Microsoft's new "Lauren" TV commercial. Frankly, I don't see what the commotion is about.



If the critics are correct, then "Lauren" is actually Lauren De Long, a Screen Actors Guild eligible actress; and apparently, if you look close enough, she never even enters the Apple store.

Even if all of that is true, it doesn't refute the fact that Apple's laptops are significantly more expensive than most PCs. It isn't a lie that Apple doesn't sell any 17-inch laptops for less than a grand. The advertisement doesn't make any reference to the quality of the machines (or contest any of the claims made in Apple's "I'm a PC" commercials) or provide any good reason to buy one other than price.

As far as I can tell, after years of horrible commercials and a series of flops, Microsoft seems to finally have hired an ad agency that put together a decent advertisement. It's not likely to persuad…