Skip to main content

On Declining Auto-Ownership

The declining trend of car-ownership in the United States has been getting some attention in the media lately. And of course, there are plenty of narratives to describe why it's happening:

And the overall drop in car ownership has prompted speculation that the long American love affair with the car is fading. Analysts cite such diverse factors as high gas prices, the expansion of many municipal transit systems, and the popularity of networking websites among teenagers replacing cars as a way of socializing.
These are all logical explanations, but the first two fail to account for the reasons why car culture developed as strongly as it did in the first place. People didn't fall in love with cars because fuel was historically cheap, it just helps that it was. Transit, if anything, has become worse over time, especially in recent years, in many cities; although in other cities new capital projects and transit-oriented-development have made it better.

How about this for an explanation: driving simply isn't very enjoyable anymore.


(from Wikipedia)

After all, the activity of driving can be exciting, just as long as the conditions are right. If I had miles and miles of open road and I could drive as fast as I wanted whenever I wanted, even I would probably buy a car and fuel, no matter the cost. But the reality is very much different. My drives would be on crowded streets and congested highways. There would be with many traffic signals. I wouldn't be able to drive fast. A few months out of the year the weather would be terrible. Most of my drives would occur in the morning (when I'm groggy) or in the evening (when I'm exhausted). To sum it up in one word: unpleasant.

That's not to say that driving was ever as great as the idealized fantasy, but undoubtedly it has changed over generations. I think that reality is finally starting to catch up with auto sales.

Comments

Alicia said…
your view, which i assume is shaped by the fact that you don't drive (it is, is it not) seems to hinge on the assertion that people drive because it is fun to drive? i think most people drive because it is much more convenient than taking public transportation. as a car owner who has taken the bus in cleveland, a few times when i've had to leave work sick precludes me from standing around waiting for a bus to take me home. there is also a socio-economic aspect to driving versus taking public transport that i care not to comment on at this time. perhaps someone else will.
Anonymous said…
You're fundamentally right.

When there's congestion, driving stops being as convenient as public transportation. Unless, of course, the public transportation is terrible.

Previous generations tried to "build their way out of congestion". But it doesn't work. After you fill up two-lane roads, road widening doesn't help with congestion much; the roads just fill up again.

In the rural areas with open roads, driving is often the most attractive and convenient method of transportation. Same in suburbs with low traffic; same in declining cities with low traffic.

In popular places with lots of people, the roads fill up immediately. Then there's congestion, and any alternative becomes attractive.

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Good Advertising

The blogosphere seems to be one fire over Microsoft's new "Lauren" TV commercial. Frankly, I don't see what the commotion is about.



If the critics are correct, then "Lauren" is actually Lauren De Long, a Screen Actors Guild eligible actress; and apparently, if you look close enough, she never even enters the Apple store.

Even if all of that is true, it doesn't refute the fact that Apple's laptops are significantly more expensive than most PCs. It isn't a lie that Apple doesn't sell any 17-inch laptops for less than a grand. The advertisement doesn't make any reference to the quality of the machines (or contest any of the claims made in Apple's "I'm a PC" commercials) or provide any good reason to buy one other than price.

As far as I can tell, after years of horrible commercials and a series of flops, Microsoft seems to finally have hired an ad agency that put together a decent advertisement. It's not likely to persuad…