Skip to main content

The Culture of Reading

I read a lot of books. I hate bad books. For every book that is on my Shelfari profile, there was probably about 1 book that I started, read 50 pages, and then quit, because it wasn't any good. I've heard that a personal library shouldn't consist of the books you've read - it should consist of the books you want to read. Sounds reasonable... if you're wealthy. I'm not. So for the moment, I have to rely on the public library as my personal library.

(from Flickr user Troy Holden)

For all the hype surrounding the iPad, I figured I'd throw in my own two cents. On this question, Daniel makes a few notable points:

Two features of the iPad have started to impress me. The first is the iBook Store. As someone who likes reading books and also tends to live in places with rather brutal winters, the ability to be up at around 1 a.m. and decide I want to buy a new book and start reading it immediately is very tempting. There’s also the utility of the iPad for higher education students who have to buy a lot of books and lug them around.
I think the 'instant gratification' phenomenon is, like Daniel says, very temping. It’s also potentially dangerous. Unlike newspapers or magazines, books aren't quite as time-sensitive. There's really no compelling reason why anyone can't wait a day or two before starting a new book. People also have a strange psychological drive to finish books that they own (I certainly behave this way), even if the books aren't any good. This is hugely problematic, because, as I said, I hate bad books. When I borrow books, I don’t feel bad about quitting 50 pages in. When I own them, I feel like I’ve wasted my money if I don't finish it.

Then there’s the question of e-textbooks. This is a hot-button for me, as I find the textbook market exploitive. Now, if e-versions of books could somehow drive down prices, I might support it; but my fear is that the opposite will occur. Under the current dead-tree textbook racket, students purchase textbooks, they use them for a semester, and then they dump them back onto the secondary market. Flooding the market with used textbooks drives down prices, as it should. E-textbooks are likely going to be non-transferrable and illiquid as assets. Textbook publishers have been trying to kill the secondary market for as long as it’s existed. This might finally be their shot.

I’m with Adam Frucci over at Gizmodo on the attractiveness of this device. It’s something I think I can live without.


Heidi said…
I do covet the iPad but I expect I'll wait until a 2nd or 3rd version comes out. Like you I've yet to adopt e-reading. I have huge stacks of books in my guest room, some read, some not. The latter are wonderful things to have as it means there is always something new I can delve into when I'm ready to start a new book.

I also share books with friends on a regular basis. It's much easier to pass paperbacks back and forth than digital devices. For travel I think an e-reader would be superb (assuming we're allowed to have it on in-flight, one never knows these days) as I'd no longer have to carry the weight of the 5 books I usually shove into my backpack on trips. But for my personal & lending library there is something to be said for dead trees (or preferably paper from a greener resource.)
Brian Phelps said…
I must say I love the instant downloads on my Kindle DX. The samples of the books you can download allow me to read usually the first 10-15 pages of the book before I buy it.

As for the iPad, until it has e-ink, I wouldn't want to use it for reading books. Short articles and blogs would be fine. If it is anything like reading on my iPhone or computer screen, the eye strain would be annoying for reading anything longer. While the color graphics and interactivity are cool, the e-ink makes a big difference when it comes to reading.

I do like to share books after reading them which is a big drawback on ereaders. Even if I could share them electronically, I don't know many people that have an ereader.
Kent said…
I'm a bibliophile that wants the physical book -- the smell, the cover art, something that doesn't run on batteries and can take a beating or a coffee spill. But that definitely isn't everyone, and so I'll be interested to see how the iPad (c'mon, iSlate or even iTab would have been better names) works for less picky readers.

Like you, I hate it when I read a bad book, and I'm more inclined to keep reading if I happen to have purchased the book. Re-reading is also pretty common, and the books I end up keeping (as opposed to off-loading at Half Priced Books) are those that have re-reading potential or reference value. If I had an iPad, I may be more inclined to purchase shorter new books or books that "everyone is talking about" under the assumption that it would be cheaper, and I wouldn't face the agonizing decision about ditching the book halfway or when I'm done with it. An iPad would be an escape from paying $25 for that new, 150-page hardcover that I simply have to have.

The tablet is taking a beating on most tech blogs, and the Gizmodo post really points out what are HUGE shortcomings. But I think we need to give this thing a year or so from its first sale date to really gauge whether tablets will catch on.
Daniel said…
Rob, I'm with you on the danger of textbooks but I also think it's not an impossible danger. You raised a good point when you said that lots of smart kids won't buy into the e-textbook market but I also think there are a lot of students out there (me included) who are pretty bitter about the used textbook market. A lot of the time you can't even recoup a third of the book's cost. I think that fact will attract a lot of students to using the iPad.

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Commuting Meets Technology

I'm finally out of the dark ages. I got an Android smartphone over the weekend and have since been in the process of exploring the Android apps market.  One thing I've immediately noticed is the really wide range of usefulness in the apps. For example, the WeatherBug app is fantastic. It automatically determines your location and gives you exact conditions for that location. On the other end of the spectrum, Google's Goggles app is supposed to be a type of 'visual search' where you snap of photo of something and Google searches for it. In each of my attempts to use it, the app hasn't returned any search results. I even took a photo of a bottle of Pepsi (figuring it as a common houseful item) and got nothing.

Somewhere in the middle is this app called Waze. Have a look at their 'guided tour':

Some people might look at it and comment on the amazing evolution of technology or on the incredible value of social networks. To me, Waze says something important ab…