Skip to main content

Transit Lessons from Las Vegas

Metropolis Magazine has a very cool article about the mostly unknown history of the Las Vegas Monorail. After my Vegas visit last spring, I wrote about the monorail as a huge missed opportunity on the strip. It seems like the article's author, Karrie Jacobs, agrees.

(from flickr user http2007)

Despite its shortcomings, there are a few things about the Monorail that seem relevant in light of the public transit crisis facing cities across America. Specifically:
  • The LV Monorail makes money.
  • The LV Monorail is privately owned.
  • The LV Monorail is completely driver-less.
For the most part, no other transit system in America can be described by all three points (or even two of them).

On the first point, it's important to keep in mind that LV Monorail fares are high, very high. A single ride costs $5 and an all-day pass runs $13. That's at least a 100% price-premium over most American transit systems. But plenty of people still pay. That's the beauty of doing business in Vegas. When people are throwing around chips worth a lot more than a single ride, what's another 5 bucks here or there? It also helps that the Monorail's costs are kept pretty low, but I'll get to that point in a moment.

Regarding the ownership, the reality is that the Monorail is operated with a different objective (to maximize profits) than most transit systems (to maximize social welfare). One reason this can occur is because the owners don't own any other transit lines. Since they don't have to subsidize money-losing service (as most transit services do) the Monorail actually operates fairly efficiently.

Lastly, the Monorail is completely automated with no on-train operators. Although it's usually nice to have someone on the train in the event that something goes wrong. The reality is that it's an insurance policy with very high premiums. The overall success of the LV Monorail in this regard seems to be evidence for the inevitability of computer-controlled transit systems. It will be a long-term transition, both because of necessary technology upgrades and union labor issues, but it's not theoretically impossible.

I'm not writing this is as practical or politically-feasible advice for struggling transit agencies, but it's definitely something to think about.

Comments

Peter said…
i'm not in favor of throwing more people out of work, but computer-controlled transit could make sense.

for one, we might not have to worry about getting locked on the train with a knife-wielding murderer...
Daniel said…
My biggest hesitation to implementing automized driving systems on trains concerns the safety of getting on and off trains.
When I was in Washington, despite significant automated safety measures, there had to be a driver to make sure nobody was caught in the doors as they were closing. I suppose you could program a computer to reopen the door when it detects something between the two doors but I imagine that accidents will happen nevertheless.

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Good Advertising

The blogosphere seems to be one fire over Microsoft's new "Lauren" TV commercial. Frankly, I don't see what the commotion is about.



If the critics are correct, then "Lauren" is actually Lauren De Long, a Screen Actors Guild eligible actress; and apparently, if you look close enough, she never even enters the Apple store.

Even if all of that is true, it doesn't refute the fact that Apple's laptops are significantly more expensive than most PCs. It isn't a lie that Apple doesn't sell any 17-inch laptops for less than a grand. The advertisement doesn't make any reference to the quality of the machines (or contest any of the claims made in Apple's "I'm a PC" commercials) or provide any good reason to buy one other than price.

As far as I can tell, after years of horrible commercials and a series of flops, Microsoft seems to finally have hired an ad agency that put together a decent advertisement. It's not likely to persuad…