Skip to main content

Movie Pricing

Nicholas Tabarrok had some interesting thoughts about movie industry pricing recently at Marginal Revolution. He points out that all movies at a given theater are priced the same, regardless of the demand for the individual films. I was reminded of this while sitting in a movie theater last Friday night that was at least 80% vacant. I was seeing the 10pm showing of The Messenger, so I paid the full price of $9. I don't know how many people were seeing the other movies that night, but presumably the "main feature" sold the most tickets.

(from flickr user Kevin H.)

Ideally, the theater manager would price the movies such that every customer pays the most they would be willing and every showing sells out. Consider this: if the theater where I saw The Messenger has a capacity of 100, and the manager sold 20 tickets for $9 each, she brought in $180 in revenue; but had she charged only $2 per ticket and sold out the theater, she would have brought in $200, plus she would have gotten an additional 80 potential concession customers (who might actually be more likely to buy popcorn or candy since their ticket only cost 2 bucks!). But this isn't how the system works. Why?

Aside from politics, union rules, and other arbitrary regulations, I think it's an information problem. If the theater manager wants to sell out every showing, she has to price every film and every showing differently - then she has to somehow manage to advertise all of those distinctions. For instance, if customers don't know they can see the 10pm showing of some film for only 2 bucks, many won't show up, the movie still won't sell out, and the manager might make less money.

There might be a better way. By pricing movie tickets the same way that airlines price their fares, theater managers might be able to generate more revenue and customers might be able to spend less on movies. A classic win-win scenario.

Imagine a system where customers could go online, and based on how early they buy tickets, how many people are expected to attend that showing, and how many people have already bought tickets, customers could can get a discounted rate. The prices would be determined entirely by how the theater manager expects to maximize revenue, possibly using a tiered system, or possibly using historic attendance data. Whatever the case, this might mean the 7pm showing on a Saturday night offers no discounts, but the 10pm showing offers some small discounts. And of course there would be a "walk-up" price, which would be equivalent to the full price that theaters charge now.

There are caveats, of course, but at least in theory, it just might work.

Comments

Mark W. said…
Rob, I think you're talking about a Georgist approach to movie pricing. The "margin" (which I guess would be not seeing the movie at all) is free, and every bit of "land" (movie seat) costs slightly more depending on its "utility" (ideal time of showing).

In Georgist theory, everybody gets to see the movie, but... the "landlord" (movie theater) gets the minimum possible "rent" (profit).

Hmmmm.
Joe said…
Movies are so much cheaper than airline tickets that nobody would go to the trouble of doing the research involved in getting a cheap ticket.

On an unrelated note, can you please start your campaign to run for mayor in the next election?
Rob Pitingolo said…
Mark, thanks for the tip, I'll look into that a little more..

Joe, thanks for stopping by! I'm surprised how many people have asked me recently about running for public office. My response is typically that I don't think I have the right personality to do a good job. I'd be better as a "behind the scenes" kind of guy.
Joe said…
As long as you're in power, making decisions- that's all that matters! I imagine our city is run by oafs who dope around without an ounce of innovation. With our location, rich culture, awesome parks, great academics, people should WANT to come to Cleveland.

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Good Advertising

The blogosphere seems to be one fire over Microsoft's new "Lauren" TV commercial. Frankly, I don't see what the commotion is about.



If the critics are correct, then "Lauren" is actually Lauren De Long, a Screen Actors Guild eligible actress; and apparently, if you look close enough, she never even enters the Apple store.

Even if all of that is true, it doesn't refute the fact that Apple's laptops are significantly more expensive than most PCs. It isn't a lie that Apple doesn't sell any 17-inch laptops for less than a grand. The advertisement doesn't make any reference to the quality of the machines (or contest any of the claims made in Apple's "I'm a PC" commercials) or provide any good reason to buy one other than price.

As far as I can tell, after years of horrible commercials and a series of flops, Microsoft seems to finally have hired an ad agency that put together a decent advertisement. It's not likely to persuad…