Skip to main content

Academics & Wikipedia

I know many academics who detest Wikipedia (not all of them, of course, but a noteworthy number). And I wholeheartedly disagree.


I don't think there is a single greater tool for educating ones self on a wide variety of topics than Wikipedia. It doesn't matter what I want to know about, I can learn about it there. It's really a depth vs. breadth debate... Wikipedia can tell you a little about a lot of topics, but it fails to tell you a lot about any single topic.

To which I think there are two important considerations. First, many Wikipedia entries now feature a pretty comprehensive 'works cited' section where you can go for more in-depth look at the topic in question. Second, the peer-reviewed journal articles that academics treat as the gold-standard of research knowledge are basically useless to anyone who doesn't already have an in-depth understanding of a particular topic. Even if they do, the articles are often locked-up and isolated from the public; available only to those willing to pay or access to university library systems. If I wanted to learn something about how an internal combustion engine works, for example, I could get a pretty decent basic understanding from Wikipedia, or I could read dozens of 40-page journal articles about obscure components of such engines and not learn a single thing.

The whole situation intrigues me because, it would seem, academics should be all about the dissemination of knowledge throughout our society; and yet, because of the minuscule chance of finding factual error somewhere out there, many have become hostile to the very idea of Wikipedia.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Good Advertising

The blogosphere seems to be one fire over Microsoft's new "Lauren" TV commercial. Frankly, I don't see what the commotion is about.



If the critics are correct, then "Lauren" is actually Lauren De Long, a Screen Actors Guild eligible actress; and apparently, if you look close enough, she never even enters the Apple store.

Even if all of that is true, it doesn't refute the fact that Apple's laptops are significantly more expensive than most PCs. It isn't a lie that Apple doesn't sell any 17-inch laptops for less than a grand. The advertisement doesn't make any reference to the quality of the machines (or contest any of the claims made in Apple's "I'm a PC" commercials) or provide any good reason to buy one other than price.

As far as I can tell, after years of horrible commercials and a series of flops, Microsoft seems to finally have hired an ad agency that put together a decent advertisement. It's not likely to persuad…