Skip to main content

Universities and Youth Magnets

The Wall Street Journal has a list of the next youth magnet cities. I hate ranking lists, even though I can't really can't disagree with the cities that popped up on this particular one.

Richard Florida weighs in with one variable that he believes attracts young people to certain cities.
Where older Americans see high-quality schools and safe streets as key, Gen Y understandably ranks the availability of outstanding colleges and universities higher. Many are likely to go back to graduate school and having great programs nearby is a big plus. When it comes to their overall community satisfaction, access to open space, being in an aesthetically beautiful city, and having access to vibrant nightlife are also quite important. Affordable housing, air, and water quality, and availability of religious institutions matter too but slightly less so.
Emphasis mine. I have issues with the idea that "great universities" drive young people to cities, both from an analytic angle and from an anecdotal angle. I don't think it's as understandably obvious as Florida suggests.

(from Wikipedia)

The Analytic Problem
In order to build a statistical model that accounts for the significance of universities as an independent variable, one of two things would have to happen. Either a) the "greatness" of universities must be put onto a measurable scale or b) "great universities" must be included as dummy variables, requiring that a subjective and arbitrary distinction be drawn between what is "great" and what is not.

In the first case, how do we know how much better any university is than another? How much better is Harvard than UMass? How much better is Stanford than UCLA? How do the best universities compare to the worst? You could use any of many available measures, like the US News rankings, but they are based on questionable methodologies, anyway. Any attempt to measure the quality of a university will be arbitrary in some way.

Further, what big city doesn't have at least one university? If you use "great universities" as a dummy variable, either every city would be coded as having one, or there would be a highly arbitrary cutoff determination as to whether or not a city has one. Does Cleveland have a great university because it has Case Western Reserve? Does Detroit not have a great university because it has only Wayne State and Detroit Mercy? Pittsburgh has Carnegie Mellon, but Cincinnati only has U of Cincinnati and Xavier. Where do you draw the line?

The Anecdotal Problem

When thinking about what cities I might want to move to after graduation, the universities in those cities has almost no impact on that thought process. If I were to go to Boston, I would definitely be close to some great universities. So what? I probably couldn't get into and pay for Harvard or MIT for grad school, even if I wanted to. Florida's explanation seems to presume that members of the creative class are so smart and so talented that they can go just about anywhere they want at a moment's notice.

A more likely explanation (and one that a friend of the blog proposed to me) is that universities attract certain kinds of amenities: specific kinds of stores, restaurants, bars, coffee shops and other hangouts. Those are things that would make me want to live in a particular city or neighborhood, but they really have little to do with the greatness of universities themselves. In that sense, any university that is sufficiently large and isn't a commuter school should effectively serve the purpose.

Lastly, the quality of a city's universities cannot change overnight. New universities do not spring out of the ground and rise to excellence in a matter of years. Some cities might be able to invest in their state schools or turn commuter schools into more campus-based environments, but unlike other things that cities can change to attract young people, they really can't do much of anything with the schools themselves.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Good Advertising

The blogosphere seems to be one fire over Microsoft's new "Lauren" TV commercial. Frankly, I don't see what the commotion is about.



If the critics are correct, then "Lauren" is actually Lauren De Long, a Screen Actors Guild eligible actress; and apparently, if you look close enough, she never even enters the Apple store.

Even if all of that is true, it doesn't refute the fact that Apple's laptops are significantly more expensive than most PCs. It isn't a lie that Apple doesn't sell any 17-inch laptops for less than a grand. The advertisement doesn't make any reference to the quality of the machines (or contest any of the claims made in Apple's "I'm a PC" commercials) or provide any good reason to buy one other than price.

As far as I can tell, after years of horrible commercials and a series of flops, Microsoft seems to finally have hired an ad agency that put together a decent advertisement. It's not likely to persuad…