Skip to main content

Tax the Poor

Living in Ohio gets annoying every year around this season. A casino issue seems to be on the ballot every year. The debate doesn't seem to be clear-cut along party lines. Both liberals and conservatives want it; and both liberals and conservatives don't.

(from flickr user LU5H.bunny)

One argument on the liberal side that I almost never hear, even though it's really one of the best arguments against a casino, is that it's a tax on the poor.

When people think of gambling, they think of Las Vegas, with the bright lights and the high rollers. They think of places like Bellagio and The Venetian and the Wynn - places that cater to whales. They forget about cities like Detroit, Michigan or Gary, Indiana or Shreveport, Louisiana - places where gambling is much less glamorous. Here is Mark Lange in the Christian Science Monitor with some numbers:
In 1999, the bipartisan National Gambling Impact Commission found that 80 percent of gambling revenue comes from households with incomes of less than $50,000 a year. More remarkably, players with annual incomes of less than $10,000 spent almost three times as much on gambling -- in aggregate, real dollars -- as those with incomes of more than $50,000. With the aggressive encouragement of state governments, US gamblers -- most of them scraping by on limited incomes -- had to lose $84 billion last year in casinos and lotteries for the states to raise $24 billion in new revenues.
There are two primary responses to this point. One is that gambling is inevitable because poor people will just play the lotto if they can't gamble in a casino. The second is that gambling is inevitable because millions (maybe billions?) of dollars are leaving the state and being given to casinos in other states without one in Ohio.

Both points are true to an extent. Yes, poor people play the lotto hoping to hit it big. But the lotto is different from casinos in the sense that it is much less exciting, less adrenaline-inducing, and generally just less fun. Give people a game that's both exciting and gives them an opportunity to hit it big, and you could easily entice people who would get bored with the lotto.

On the second point, it's true that some people leave one state to gamble in others. Who are these people? Are they retirees taking charter buses to other states to spend a lazy afternoon with friends playing penny slots? The truly poor are not spending much money in neighboring states because they cannot even afford to travel to those places. Put a casino in their backyard and yes, they will start going.

Lastly, because of the way casino corporations are structured, it really is taxing the poor to give to the rich, since only a proportion of gambling revenue will go back to the state, the rest will go to shareholders in the casino (all of whom will probably be rich).

I'd like to start hearing some advertisements with arguments along these lines, rather than nonsense about whether or not the casino will create the promised number of jobs. The opponents of casinos need to start giving people a reason to oppose the issue, not merely a reason not to support it. This is an issue that is important to the long-term vitality of cities, but we focus only on the immediate future. Regardless of my own opinions about gambling and whether or not I would ever visit one in Ohio if it were built, unless I buy a condo in Las Vegas, I'm not very interested in living in a city with casinos.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I disagree that casinos are taxes on the poor. Instead casinos are taxes on those who feel that they can win or more simply those with a highier risk profile. True, these same people may often be the poor or old folks but those are the ones who have little opportunity to "gamble" in markets. Lets face it if a rich person wants to gamble they usually can call up their broker a pick a "flyer". I believe a person decides to "gamble" because that person feels they may have a competitive advantage or better information in one arena or another (casinos, lotto, fantasy football, race track, etc). Unfortunately, some of these arenas, lotto specifically, have minimal barriers to entry ($2 ticket)with minimal opportunity to be successful without some knowledge of the topic.

Popular posts from this blog

In Praise of Southwest's 'C' Boarding Group

A few weeks ago I saw a tweet from someone complaining that their Southwest Airlines boarding pass had been assigned A20 (meaning they would be at least one of the first twenty passengers to board the plane). Apparently this person though they should have been assigned a higher number, less their flight experience be considerably spoiled.

Despite the complaints, Southwest has resisted demands to assign seats on its flights, a decision which I personally applaud. I'll admit that I was skeptical when they rolled out the newest boarding procedure, assigning both boarding groups and a line number; but in hindsight it seems like one of the best operational decisions they've ever made. If nothing else, it effectively eliminated the infamous "cattle call" whereby fliers were getting to airports hours in advance and sitting in line on the floor as if they were waiting for the midnight showing of the new Star Wars movie.

When I was an intern at Southwest Airlines last winter, I…

So You Want to be a Southwest Airlines Intern?

My personal website must have pretty decent SEO - because in the past year, I've received about two dozen emails from aspiring Southwest Airlines interns looking to draw on my experience in search of their own dream internship. In the past two weeks alone a few new emails have already started rolling in...

(from flickr user San Diego Shooter)

If you've found your way here, you might be hoping for the silver bullet; a secret tip that will propel you above the competition. Unfortunately, I do not know any inside secrets. I can only share my experience as an internship candidate about two years ago and, rather than responding individually to future emails I anticipate to receive, I hope that potential interns will find the information posted here valuable.

Understand: Southwest Airlines is a very unique company. The corporate culture at Southwest is truly unlike that of nearly every other company. But you probably already knew that, since it now seems mandatory for every management,…

Good Advertising

The blogosphere seems to be one fire over Microsoft's new "Lauren" TV commercial. Frankly, I don't see what the commotion is about.



If the critics are correct, then "Lauren" is actually Lauren De Long, a Screen Actors Guild eligible actress; and apparently, if you look close enough, she never even enters the Apple store.

Even if all of that is true, it doesn't refute the fact that Apple's laptops are significantly more expensive than most PCs. It isn't a lie that Apple doesn't sell any 17-inch laptops for less than a grand. The advertisement doesn't make any reference to the quality of the machines (or contest any of the claims made in Apple's "I'm a PC" commercials) or provide any good reason to buy one other than price.

As far as I can tell, after years of horrible commercials and a series of flops, Microsoft seems to finally have hired an ad agency that put together a decent advertisement. It's not likely to persuad…